• Cuba today

    Reports, analysis, and stories from the struggle of the Cuban people to defend and build their socialist revolution.

  • The Quebec Student Strike

    The story of the biggest student mobilization in Canadian history as it unfolds.

  • The Class Struggle in Greece

    Reporting the viewpoint of the Communist Youth and the Communist Party of Greece for a People's Greece.

  • The youth movement

    Statements and analysis about the way forward for the youth and student movement in Canada today by the YCL-LJC.

  • Socialist theory

    Reflections on how to build a better world from a Leninist point of view.

Harper Anti-Environment Record

Friday, June 24, 2011 0 comments

One of the pressing issues of our lifetime is the rectification of environmental degradation wrought by human agency across the globe. Public opinion polls indicate people in Canada acknowledge the environment as a priority issue, yet the environment was not a key issue in the recent Federal Election.

The Liberals, Greens, and NDP, all put forward their respective environmental visions. But even the NDP, arguably the best among them, fell far from the mark. Of course the environmental solutions of all of the Parliamentary opposition parties are stuck in the same box of the capitalist free market; the same economic system that is responsible for the environmental crisis facing us today. The Harper Tories, meanwhile, continue to follow their unabashed anti-environment, pro-corporate agenda.

Upon election in 2006 the Harper Tories immediately travelled south to pledge Canadian oil to the USA government of George W. Bush. The week of the election, in a two day meeting, Harper and Co. pledged to increase oil sands production by five times, as well as “streamline” environmental regulations for energy products. In the months that followed, fifteen federal programs to reduce green house gasses were cut. Since, several more climate change programs in the agriculture ministry have been cut as well.

The 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen initially offered hope for a binding worldwide treaty on reducing greenhouse gasses. Afterwards, Canada was widely considered the single largest barrier to achieving that goal. Having abandoned the earlier Kyoto Accord targets as “socialist”, the Harper Conservatives successfully blocked another attempt at mitigating human impact on the environment.

To Harper and company, climate change and all proposals to address are no more than another dreaded socialist conspiracy. For Harper and the corporate interests he represents, the long term danger of the environmental crisis is outweighed by the immediate opportunities to extract immense profits and the expense of the planet. It is hard to see the effects of environmental catastrophe from the pool side of mansions in exclusive, sheltered communities. It’s always easy to see the bottom line.

In other words, we can’t rely on those who are wedded to the capitalist economic system to take the necessary action on the environment. What is necessary is the build up of a broad resistance to the system which allows such environmental degradation. Environmentalism as a mass movement must unite people in struggle to ensure a safe future for humanity. Dumping Harper is the first step, but we also have to dump capitalism. Only a progressive alternative to the current mode of production, the sweeping away of capitalist commodification and exploitation in favour of a commonly owned planned economy, can ensure sustainable production which also meets the needs of all people.

Canadian Boat to Gaza fights onward

Thursday, June 23, 2011 0 comments

The blockade *is* illegal no matter what Israel claims:

An expert legal opinion on International Maritime Law and the Gaza blockade



Ambassador Craig Murray is a former Alternate Head of the UK Delegation to the United Nations Preparatory Commission on the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.  He was deputy head of the teams which negotiated the UK's maritime boundaries with France, Germany, Denmark (Faeroe Islands) and Ireland.
As Head of the Maritime Section of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, he was responsible for giving real time political and legal clearance to Royal Navy boarding operations in the Persian Gulf following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, in enforcement of the UN authorised blockade against Iraqi weapons shipments. 
Ambassador Craig Murray is therefore an internationally recognised authority on maritime jurisdiction and naval boarding issues.

His analysis of the Israeli blockade of Gaza and the right of the Gaza flotilla to sail.
"The legal position is plain.  A vessel outwith the territorial waters (12 mile limit) of a coastal state is on the high seas under the sole jurisdiction of the flag state of the vessel.  The ship has a positive right of  passage on the high seas.  The coastal state can regulate economic activity exploiting the resources of the seas and continental shelf up to 200 miles, the extent of the continental shelf, or the agreed boundary, but there is no indication of fishing, oil drilling or analagous economic activity in this case.  The vessel is entitled to free passage."
"This right of free passage is guaranteed by the UN Convention on the Law of the Seas, to which the United States is a full party.  Any incident which takes place upon a US flagged ship on the High Seas is subject to United States legal jurisdiction.  A ship is entitled to look to its flag state for protection from attack on the High Seas."
"Israel has declared a blockade on Gaza and justified previous fatal attacks on neutral civilian vessels on the High Seas in terms of enforcing that embargo, under the legal cover given by the San Remo Manual of International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea."
"There are however fundamental flaws in this line of argument.    It falls completely on one fact alone.  San Remo only applies to blockade in times of armed conflict.  Israel is not currently engaged in an armed conflict, and presumably does not wish to be.  San Remo does not confer any right to impose a permanent blockade outwith times of armed conflict, and in fact specifically excludes as illegal a general blockade on an entire population."
"It should not be denied that Israel suffers from sporadic terrorist attacks emanating from Gaza.  However this does not come close  to reaching the bar of armed conflict that would trigger the right to impose a limited naval blockade in terms of San Remo.  To make a comparison, in the 1970's and 1980's the United Kingdom suffered continued terrorist attack from the Irish Republican Army, with much more murderous impact causing many more deaths than anything Israel has suffered in recent years from Gaza.  However nobody would seek to argue that the UK would have had the right to mount a general naval blockade of the Republic of Ireland in the 1970's and 1980's, even though the Republic was undoubtedly the base for much IRA supply and operations.  Justifications of Israeli naval action against neutral civilian ships by San Remo is based on special pleading and an impossibly strained definition of the term
"armed conflict". "
For more information Craig Murray can be reached at  craigmurray1710@btinternet.com

www.tahrir.ca

CUPW on the current situation with the postal lock out

0 comments

Negotiations Going Nowhere: CPC Waits for Harper’s Law
June 22, 2011
Since the introduction of the back-to-work legislation into the House of Commons, there have been a few meetings between CUPW, Labour Minister Lisa Raitt and CPC officials, including CPC President Deepak Chopra. Yesterday, CUPW submitted a very serious proposal designed to break the deadlock. Today we received CPC's reply. Essentially they made no significant moves and are maintaining 10 demands for major rollbacks, including the elimination of sick leave, lower wages and deep cuts in benefits and pensions for new hires. They did nothing to address the problems of postal workers. They did offer to make a move on the issue of percentage of coverage for letter carriers on the condition that we agree to further lower the wages of new hires.

Meet the New Boss
Since the introduction of the legislation, the messages from CPC have been inconsistent and contradictory. In our first discussion with Deepak Chopra and Labour Minister Raitt, we were somewhat optimistic that there might be a serious effort to negotiate. Mr. Chopra made a commitment that the terms of CPC's June 9th offer were still on the table. However, less than two hours later, at a meeting of the finance sub-table, CPC formally reduced their wage proposal for new hires to $18.00 per hour from the $19.00 contained in the June 9th proposal. Since then, they have put back their offer of $19.00. Will it change again?

Same as the Old Boss
From the very beginning of this set of negotiations, CPC has maintained a hard line position designed by former CPC President Moya Greene before she abandoned Canada Post to go to the UK and receive a million dollar salary to privatize the Royal Mail. After she left, Prime Minister Harper appointed Deepak Chopra to perpetuate their agenda of deep cuts to our benefits, pensions and rights.
Since then, CPC has refused to bargain, stopped all mail delivery by locking us out, and done everything possible to provoke back-to-work legislation.

We Won't Be Fooled
During the next days, we can expect CPC, the Government and the corporate media to mount an attack on postal workers and CUPW. They will say anything to try and convince you and the public that we are to blame for the breakdown of bargaining and the back-to-work legislation. But we won't be fooled. We know we did everything possible to negotiate a collective agreement that meets our needs and preserves public postal services. We entered these negotiations with a practical and modest set of demands, but we were met with a brick wall of corporate greed.
If the government and Mr. Chopra believe they can defeat postal workers, they are seriously mistaken. We will continue to demand justice for ourselves and others. We will continue to exercise all of the rights that we have under our collective agreement. And we will continue to fight for improved postal services to the public. We will continue to struggle for a collective agreement that is freely negotiated and ratified by the membership.

No Justice, No Peace. The Struggle Continues.

YCLSA welcomes ANCYL Apology

0 comments

YCLSA welcomes ANCYL Apology
23 June 2011

The Young Communist League of South Africa [uFasimba] welcomes the apology of comrade Julius Malema to all South African women and the rape accuser of President Zuma, for his sexist and derogative remarks.

As an organisation we had always insisted that, while President Zuma was innocent, our support for him must take into account the feelings of hundreds and hundreds of women who are victims of rape and abuse. We had argued that our democracy can only be said to be matured only if woman are free from any form of exploitation by men.

We applaud comrade Malema for finally realising his wrong judgment no the matter, as Young Communist League we shall continue to fight for the Right of all women in our country. We hope that the apology will bring closure to this matter.

Issued by YCLSA

For more information, please contact Mafika Mndebele (National Spokesperson)
Landline: (011) 339 3621
Cellphone: 073 574 5953
Cellphone: 082 567 3557
Email: mafikadamane.mndebele@gmail.com

Support the Postal Workers! Stop the Conservative Attack on Working People!

Monday, June 20, 2011 0 comments

On June 3rd, members of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers hit the streets in a series of rotating 24 hour strikes. The strikes, supported by a 94.5% mandate, came as a result of months of negotiations eventually came to a stall.

Canada Post is demanding outrageous concessions from CUPW, including a 22% pay decrease for new hires, the gutting of sick leave benefits, the imposition of a two-tier pension plan, and more. The corporation reacted to CUPW’s legal strike action with a lockout, sycophantically claiming that “"If we allow the uncertainty created by the rotating strikes to continue, our ability to remain financially self-sufficient and not become a burden on Canadian taxpayers will be in jeopardy”.

Working people, youth, and students, should not be fooled by the attempts of the Harper Conservatives or of Canada Post to paint the situation as a standoff between union workers and “the taxpayer”. The reality is that Postal Workers are merely fighting to defend the working conditions and benefits which have taken decades of struggle to win.

In fact, there is a lot at stake in this dispute for all Canadians, not just the Posties. The attack on CUPW is undoubtedly part of a broader strategy aimed at opening the way for the privatization of Canada’s postal service by destroying the two main barriers to such a move: public support for the public post office, and the union. The result will be the proliferation of much more expensive for-profit services.

Not only in this attack on Postal Workers a wedge for privatization of postal services, but it is also the opening shot in the Harper majority governments coming offensive on working people and organized labour.

Having legislated members of the Canadian Auto Workers at Air Canada back to work only days ago, the Tories are now looking at using similar legislation against Postal Workers.

The legislation was introduced in Parliament on June 20th, and is, as described by the union, both unnecessary and unjust. In fact, the legislation is a clear interference in the collective bargaining process by the Federal government on behalf of the employer. The legislation includes arbitrary fines for those who defy it, and a requirement for mandatory arbitration with a pro-employer mandate.

Back to work legislation violates the basic rights of working people by subverting the rights of their unions to fair collective bargaining and the use of legal strike action. The Postal Workers are at the forefront of the first major struggle against the ultra-reactionary Conservative government. CUPW members will be faced with difficult decisions in the coming days and it is incumbent on the labour movement, and all progressive people, to support them however possible.

Youth and students in particular should support the Postal Workers and join them on the picket lines. Privatization, and the rollback of working peoples hard-won rights, can be stopped by a strong, united fightback. If not, the effects on youth today, and into the future, will be severe.

 
Rebel Youth Magazine © 2013 | Designed by RumahDijual